After a few of my recent mediocre race results, I was reminded of the benefits of using a conservative strategy for road racing. Looking at the results of the Morgul Bismark Road Race, it was apparent that almost all the strong riders eventually made it to the front of the race. This isn’t surprising considering the difficult course, but the key is being able to go with the right move at the right time.
Luck is always part of making the right move, but you have to be fresh enough to physically go with it. To have the freshness, conservation is important. I think that often times bike racers have an aggressive strategy when it comes to making their own luck. By this I mean that if a dangerous looking move goes up the road, they are more likely to try to go with it than to wait.
Racer’s egos probably feel better after a race if they went with a move that didn’t pan out, rather than staying in the peloton and watching the winning move ride away. But is there really any difference? Either way, the race is lost.
For a newer racer with reasonable fitness, it may be a decent strategy to go with every move. Eventually they will get lucky and find the right group and a good result. But after honing one’s race craft over the years by racing a lot, watching races, and knowing the competition, a conservative strategy may become more effective.
There is a racer on my team who frequently employs a conservative race strategy. I’ve heard other teams sometimes call him ‘Magic’, because of his uncanny ability to hide out until precisely the right moment, when he appears in the winning move. I’ve raced with him a fair bit, and I can attest to his conservative approach.
To give a specific example, I’ll use the recent Morgul Bismark course. The Wall is a key point in the course and can split the peloton. Take for example the peloton splitting in half on The Wall midway through the race. Of course, there is a chance that half the field will be left behind. But more likely, the riders in back at risk of being separated will organize to regroup.
Think of the motivations in a split peloton of an amateur race. In the front, the riders are initially unaware who is in the front group, and possibly even that the field has split. Teams are generally disorganized and unlikely to organize at the front to eliminate a few threats left in the chase group.
In the back half, few riders will want to see the front group ride away. Freelancers (those not racing for team tactics) will absolutely want to chase back on. Those racing for teams may want to chase back to help their teammates. “Type A” racers will want to chase simply because they don’t want to be dropped.
Many racers finding themselves on the back half of a split will take the aggressive strategy and chase. It is the natural instinct of the typical “Type A” bike racer. They are ‘making their own luck’ by working to re-join the field, but in the process may be building up too much fatigue, so they can’t play a role later in the race. Using a conservative strategy and patiently waiting for the others to chase back on is equally risky, but the payoff will be greater.
The next time a race is fracturing, rather than thinking “I need to make sure I make the front group, and will to work to make it happen”, try looking at the situation first. Is it early in the race? (more fresh chasers thinking “I can’t get dropped in the first 10 minutes!”) – Are the groups equally sized? (a fair fight) – Are there still some strong racers around you? (there is more danger if all the strong riders are in the front group).
This post may be viewed as advocating for wheel sucking, I view it as a reminder that everyone in a bike race has different motivations and goals. If you’re racing to win, there may be riders who “want to place in the top half this time” and will be perfectly happy to work to pin the race back together. Think of your decisions in a race as not only as your own tactics working towards your own goals, but as making the tactics of those around you also work to your benefit.













